The lesson I've been cherishing lately from Indexicalism (both the book and the doctrine) is that we can take the notion that beings are dehiscent, insufficient, wounded and open to their exterior that you get in Levinas' descriptions and apply it across the board: each situated thing is open to an other with which it can be said to enjoy a measure of metaphysical desire. This could entail waging war to acquire properties, features, songs, names from the other, eating the other, bringing the other into one's own space or making use of the other to achieve something. There are different kinds of metaphysical desires and only some of them are oriented by the rejection of the reduction of the other to the same (that we can call, with Levinas, 'ontologism', but also can be seen as a form of 'substantivism', in the terminology of Indexicalism ). Does that mean that metaphysical desire per se is ubiquitous? Yes, I would say that. Notice that there is no pan-psych...
Memory Assemblages is out at Bloomsbury This is the book I wrote during most of 22 and 23. It proposes a spectral realism based on the idea that archives are ubiquitous - I call this pan-mnemism. It offers a conception of how memory related deeply with persistent addition of new events, thoughts and circumstances and this addends concoct varying assemblages of what is retained and what brings this archives to the fore. It also rejects the idea that there is an archeology to the archive - or an ontology to hauntology. Even if it boils down merely to postulate traces or forms. I have neglected this blog for a while and I don't expect myself to be very much back to it soon. But I will talk about the book in my youtube channel, in an English language playlist called "On Memory Assemblages" .