Skip to main content

Note on accelerationism (and the Accelerate manifesto)

I was thrilled to find Alex Williams and Nick Srnicek's Accelerate Manifesto which has been around for about a month. Less thrilled to read it. Not only the discussion is very sketchy (no concrete proposals) but also not to the point. I take that the Accelerationismusstreit is not really about favoring or not technology (or technological advancement) or defending horizontalism or local action. The issue is really about whether a desired post-capitalism is brought about by instituting a device that accelerates the speed of the flows within the socia. The issue is, I take, of whether we should struggle for further deterritorialization or we should rather resist the drive of capital to speed interactions up. It is a many faced issue: the ontological discussion has to do with whether to think in terms of flows or production and registration is to think in terms of a scheme of work and goods, as Benjamim Noys points out, and maybe to break with capitalism requires also a break with this scheme. Other discussions have to do with whether the internet flow of sharing (including the internet of things which is coming up) is a flow that overtakes capital (as Negrians once maintained - and I believe Neonegrism is a likely development to be seen in the near future). This has to do with the very issue of whether devices of alternative economics - oxydating money, gift-giving etc - can scale up (an idea that systems of holoptic credit are playing with, in ideas such as Jean-François Noubel's). I guess a point can be made in favor of accelerationism in all these debates and the Manifesto is silent about most of them. To be fair, they do mention D&G's point that capitalism de-territorializes while re-territorializing, which is a crucial point to discuss Nick Land's hopes and to understand the crux of the matter in an accelerationist criticism of capitalism (and not only of neoliberalism). I believe that capitalism reinforces elements of the economic family, privatizes and medicalizes deliria and other politically relevant subjective states (D&G's point in the Anti-Oedipus) and, most important, depends on the human induvidual - the agent of economic action. The accelerationist criticism of capitalism should look for something that de-territorializes what capitalism keeps well in place.

But the Manifesto also talks, strangely enough, about planning (The Plan married to The Network, it says). I guess planning is something that accelerationism makes us think about. To be sure, some planning is probably part of an accelerationist conspiracy against capital. But planning as such strikes me as too slow, too overtaken by capital itself and too human to be part of an accelerationist toolkit. Also, planning is based on information misdistribution, as Wark points out in Celerity, a good criticism of the Manifesto. The very idea of planning needs an accelerationist critique.
Also, Benjamim Noys contrasts accelerationism (and all its consequences) to planning. In any case, the unqualified appeal to planning in the Manifesto seems to make the whole proposal dangerously close to pre-accelerationist anti-capitalism. Further, it is not enough to prescribe a marriage (between planning and networking). It seems just like a centrist proposal, as Wark points out. Something about the dowry should also be mentioned...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hunky, Gunky and Junky - all Funky Metaphysics

Been reading Bohn's recent papers on the possibility of junky worlds (and therefore of hunky worlds as hunky worlds are those that are gunky and junky - quite funky, as I said in the other post). He cites Whitehead (process philosophy tends to go hunky) but also Leibniz in his company - he wouldn't take up gunk as he believed in monads but would accept junky worlds (where everything that exists is a part of something). Bohn quotes Leibniz in On Nature Itself «For, although there are atoms of substance, namely monads, which lack parts, there are no atoms of bulk, that is, atoms of the least possible extension, nor are there any ultimate elements, since a continuum cannot be composed out of points. In just the same way, there is nothing greatest in bulk nor infinite in extension, even if there is always something bigger than anything else, though there is a being greatest in the intensity of its perfection, that is, a being infinite in power.» And New Essays: ... for there is nev
1 comment
Read more

Talk on ultrametaphysics

 This is the text of my seminar on ultrametaphysics on Friday here in Albuquerque. An attempt at a history of ultrametaphysics in five chapters Hilan Bensusan I begin with some of the words in the title. First, ‘ultrametaphysics’, then ‘history’ and ‘chapters’. ‘Ultrametaphysics’, which I discovered that in my mouth could sound like ‘ autre metaphysics’, intends to address what comes after metaphysics assuming that metaphysics is an endeavor – or an epoch, or a project, or an activity – that reaches an end, perhaps because it is consolidated, perhaps because it has reached its own limits, perhaps because it is accomplished, perhaps because it is misconceived. In this sense, other names could apply, first of all, ‘meta-metaphysics’ – that alludes to metaphysics coming after physics, the books of Aristotle that came after Physics , or the task that follows the attention to φύσις, or still what can be reached only if the nature of things is considered. ‘Meta-m
Post a Comment
Read more

Memory assemblages

My talk here at Burque last winter I want to start by thanking you all and acknowledging the department of philosophy, the University of New Mexico and this land, as a visitor coming from the south of the border and from the land of many Macroje peoples who themselves live in a way that is constantly informed by memory, immortality and their ancestors, I strive to learn more about the Tiwas, the Sandia peoples and other indigenous communities of the area. I keep finding myself trying to find their marks around – and they seem quite well hidden. For reasons to do with this very talk, I welcome the gesture of directing our thoughts to the land where we are; both as an indication of our situated character and as an archive of the past which carries a proliferation of promises for the future. In this talk, I will try to elaborate and recommend the idea of memory assemblage, a central notion in my current project around specters and addition. I begin by saying that I
Post a Comment
Read more