Skip to main content

The metaphysics of paradox?

I'm signing a contract with the Edinburgh University Press to publish the book I called Deictic Absolutes in the Speculative Realism series. They want to change the title of the book and name it Indexicalism: The Metaphysics of Paradox. I'm not yet fully sure. I copy here the table of contents:

Table of Contents

Introduction: Reality and speculation
Speculative realism and the Great Outdoors
Totality and speculation
Other dialogues
The paradox of deictic speculation

1. Indexicalism: a paradoxico-metaphysics
Indexicalism
Paradoxico-metaphysics
The routes to indexicalism (and paradox)
Situated metaphysics
Monadologies
Totality
Demonstratives and proper names
Tense realism and baroque realism
Horizon
Measurement
Exteriority and externalism
Proximity
Object-oriented
Tentacular thinking

2. The metaphysics of the others
The others
The φύσις of the others
Perspectivism
The metaphysics of the others at the age of the correlate
Meillassoux
After speculation
The priority of the others
The interrupted nexus
Process metaphysics of the others
Robinsonology and transcendental xenology
From the Other to the Great Outdoors
Perception and supplement

3. The hospitality of perception
Doors of perception
Hospitality and the Given
The complexities of receptivity
Importance and supplement
Perceiving is responding
Metaphysical empiricism
Pan-perceptualism
Proximity, conversation and experience
Deictic absolutes

Coda: The circumscription of Potosí
Epistemic abundance
The Potosí principled
Ch'ixi
Being up for grabs
Absolutely situated

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dismantling absolute contingency

I´ve been wondering about whether we can formulate something about contingency along the lines of a principle of irreduction: aucune chose n´est par elle-même contingent ou necessaire . The principle asserts that necessity is always contingent on underlying fixed things: something is physically necessary (or contingent) given the fixed laws of nature, something is deontically contingent - allowed - or necessary - mandatory - given the fixed ethical rules (or laws of the land). Finally, something is logically necessary (or necessary simpliciter) given a fixed logic. The irreducible diversity of ethical rules, the absence of eternal laws of nature and the plurality of logical systems, if accepted, makes necessity relative to those parameters. An aggiornamento of Heraclitus would have that nothing is necessary comes what may. Surely, of couse, if there is no absolute necessity, there is no absolute contingency. We can then say that in a broader, more abstract level, things are up for grab...
6 comments
Read more

Necropolitics and Neocameralism

It is perhaps just wishful thinking that the alt-right seemingly innovative and intrepid ideas will disappear from the scene as Trump's reign comes to an end. They have their own dynamics, but certainly the experiences of the last years, including those in the pandemics, do help to wear off their bright and attractiveness. Neocameralism, what Mencius Moldbug and Nick Land with him ushered in as a model of post-democracy that relinquish important ingredients of the human security system, is one of these projects that is proving to be too grounded in the past to have any capacity to foretell anything bright beyond the democratic rusting institutions. It is little more than necropolitics - which is itself a current post-democratic alternative. Achile Mbembe finds necropolitics in the regimes were warlords take over the state-like institutions (or mimick them)  to rule on the grounds of local security having no troubles killing or letting die whoever is in their path. Neocameralism pos...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Cathedral and the axiomatics of capital

Today in my Cosmopolitics of Capital class, instead of discussing Lyotard´s evil book in connection to Moldbug and Land´s ideas, as planned, we spent hours considering bits of The Anti-Oedipus under the light of Neo-cameralist ideas and some remarks Land makes about the horror that is often triggered as an emotional response to (Neo-cameralist) statements about the Cathedral. We concentrated on the bit of chapter 3, section 10 where Deleuze and Guattari talk about class struggle and the bourgeoisie as a class eroder. There they describe how capitalism decodes the flows of castes, orders, and classes in the sense of feudal aristocracy, serfdom and peasantry. The erosion affects also the proletariat that is never associated with a specific job or type of service but rather a decoded abstract worker. This decoding is precisely what makes the proletariat universal and directly linked with the productive forces - which means, for Deleuze and Guattari, that they are potentially the schizo, ...
Post a Comment
Read more