Skip to main content

Skendes and recursive ontology (partly by Imogen Reed)


Imogen Reed wrote to me kindly offering a piece of writing to this blog. I suggested him to write something on Skendes, the Ethiopian philosopher, which he promptly did. Skendes´life and his decision for silence as a punishment self-inflicted for having fooled his mother and cause her to suicide through his speech calls my attention. It could also be seen as yet another slant on the Oedipus narrative. Plus, his silence - his oral quietism - probably influenced the image of a philosopher - or of a wise person - in some parts of the world.

I was reading some of the questions and answers of Skendes book. Question 18 is about the ocean and he connects it with a womb. Not a surprising connection (with even an evolutionary ring to it). It made me think of the recursive element here: the womb is a generator of all that exist - "the whole world is in its womb" - and yet it is exists. The womb is not outside the world as the monads are not outside matter. Ontogenesis is part of ontology. It is not outside it like we think of abstraction. It can even be thought as an object amidst others, but it can also be a repository of matter ("it has no boundaries", writes Skendes) that germinates future bodies as it acts as unemployed matter. Unemployment is what points at what is yet to be a job - unregistered production. The ocean - or the womb - is made of what is going to exist or, rather, is going to be made of what exists.

I include below part of the text on Skendes sent by Imogen:

The much celebrated story of Skendes an ancient philosopher has occupied the storytelling generations of Greek, Syrian, Arabic and Ethiopian scholars over centuries. It has been argued between Arabic, Greek and Ethiopian who the text is based on – with the Ethiopian text based on Arabic and yet some scholars state it is stylized on the Greek people. The story itself as the Ethiopian version goes tells of Skendes, son of shrewd parents, wanting the best education for their son, that decided to send him for a classical education to Berytus (Beirut) and Athens. At the time Skendes left for this scholarly mission he was just thirteen years old.

Whilst abroad Skendes was exposed to the thoughts of so called wise philosophers who told him “All women are prostitutes”. Determined to test this theory after staying away for twenty four years he returned to his former home country and decided to test his own mother. By tricking a maid into letting him into his mother's house he ended up spending the night with his own mother. Upon revealing himself as her son she was so appalled by the discovery that she hung herself.

As a punishment for allowing his tongue to ultimately cause his own mother's death via his deceitful means Skendes made a vow never to speak again. From that moment on he remained mute as a penance for speaking at all.

At the time the emperor was Andryanos – upon hearing of Skendes' unusual story he invited him to his court. Instead of speaking his thoughts when ordered to he wrote them down. As a result Emperor Andryanos communicated back to him through writing with his responses being organised into two sections.

The first section contained fifty-five sections and the second, one hundred and eight questions. Skendes developed theories in answer to these questions, all about the essence of God, the angels, man, the world, the sun, moon, stars, sky, clouds and earth as well as the mind, the spirit, the winds, thunder, the air, the ocean, the soul, man and woman. After the emperor listened with great care to what Skendes was saying (writing) he was acutely impressed and did not again order the philosopher to speak. Instead he officially declared that Skendes by treated as a national treasure and be preserved in the priests' archives.

Comments

  1. hilan, esse post me incomodou.
    começando pelo "The ocean - or the womb - is made of what is going to exist or, rather, is going to be made of what exists." acho fera essa pegada de ser completo de potencialidades - que Ă© o que entendo de 'ser feito do que existirĂ¡'- Ă© marota, mesmo porque acho que todas as coisas sĂ£o assim, feitas do que existirĂ¡. mas ao mesmo tempo pode ser que esvazie as coisas do que existe... mas nĂ£o Ă© isso que quero dizer, queria saber o que vocĂª entende pela segunda parte 'serĂ¡ feito do que existe'. fiquei querendo ler essa questĂ£o dezoito ai pra saber pra que lado vai...

    esse começo do texto me incomodou por causa dessa ligaĂ§Ă£o mar-Ăºtero-feminino-aquilo-que-dĂ¡-existĂªncia-ao-mundo-mas-nĂ£o-existe-propriamente. nĂ£o sei se Ă© a pegada que vocĂª quer mesmo porque diz que 'the womb is not outside the world as the monads are not outside matter'. mas mesmo assim, parece que a Ăªnfase estĂ¡ no que existirĂ¡ a partir do mar/Ăºtero/feminino. parece reducionista da complexidade do oceano/Ăºtero, visto apenas como produtor de mundo. a ontogĂªnese de fato tem que ser parte da ontologia, mas o Ăºtero ou o mar nĂ£o sĂ£o o começo absoluto, estĂ£o no meio tambĂ©m. o mar nĂ£o Ă© de gelo, oras.

    Ă³bvio que a narrativa da origem do skendes tambĂ©m me incomoda. tudo bem, concedo que boa parte do incomodo tem a ver com ser um Ă©dipo que agride mais nossas sensibilidades cristianizadas (nĂ£o Ă© um engano do Ă©dipo, mas um Ă©dipo enganando uma jocasta em nome de provar uma teoria um tanto misĂ³gina sobre 'a-natureza-das-mulheres') digo que agride sensibilidades cristianizadas, porque a coisa da escolha, da intenĂ§Ă£o tĂ¡ ai em jogo. Ă©dipo nĂ£o teve a intenĂ§Ă£o, mas skendes teve.
    mas agride tambĂ©m pelo desfecho: ele realmente provou a teoria grega da natureza das mulheres, e pra isso uma mulher teve que morrer. novamente, mulheres morrendo por causa de homens e suas teorias malucas sobre a natureza do mundo, da natureza, do amor, das prĂ³prias mulheres...
    e, poxa, esse Ă© o Ăºtero que cria o skendes filĂ³sofo, sabe? com a virtude da quietude, um cara perturbado por seu passado, blĂ¡. www.quepreguiça.kit.net

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sim, a estoria do Skendes Ă© patriarcado puro. Acho que forcei a barra pra usar o post que o cara me ofereceu (no qual. na verdade, ele queria que incluĂ­sse um link pra uma companhia de seguros...). A coisa do Ăºtero-oceano era pra tentar mostrar que ontogĂªnese com ontologia, as coisas que existem produzindo outras, mas nem por isso existem menos. O mar nĂ£o Ă© gelo. O mar ta aĂ­. "Is made of what is going to exist or, rather, is going to be made of what exists" pareceu interessante porque o oceano-Ăºtero Ă©, mas Ă© feito do que virĂ¡. Talvez melhor do que is going to be made of what exists, nesse caso, sua composiĂ§Ă£o Ă© que estĂ¡ no futuro. Gosto da idĂ©ia de que ontogĂªnese Ă© ontologia, aquilo que forma, nĂ£o estĂ¡ do lado de fora das coisas, mas no meio delas.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hunky, Gunky and Junky - all Funky Metaphysics

Been reading Bohn's recent papers on the possibility of junky worlds (and therefore of hunky worlds as hunky worlds are those that are gunky and junky - quite funky, as I said in the other post). He cites Whitehead (process philosophy tends to go hunky) but also Leibniz in his company - he wouldn't take up gunk as he believed in monads but would accept junky worlds (where everything that exists is a part of something). Bohn quotes Leibniz in On Nature Itself «For, although there are atoms of substance, namely monads, which lack parts, there are no atoms of bulk, that is, atoms of the least possible extension, nor are there any ultimate elements, since a continuum cannot be composed out of points. In just the same way, there is nothing greatest in bulk nor infinite in extension, even if there is always something bigger than anything else, though there is a being greatest in the intensity of its perfection, that is, a being infinite in power.» And New Essays: ... for there is nev...

Memory Assemblages out!

  Memory Assemblages is out at Bloomsbury This is the book I wrote during most of 22 and 23. It proposes a spectral realism based on the idea that archives are ubiquitous - I call this pan-mnemism. It offers a conception of how memory related deeply with persistent addition of new events, thoughts and circumstances and this addends concoct varying assemblages of what is retained and what brings this archives to the fore. It also rejects the idea that there is an archeology to the archive - or an ontology to hauntology. Even if it boils down merely to postulate traces or forms. I have neglected this blog for a while and I don't expect myself to be very much back to it soon. But I will talk about the book in my youtube channel, in an English language playlist called "On Memory Assemblages" .  

Necropolitics and Neocameralism

It is perhaps just wishful thinking that the alt-right seemingly innovative and intrepid ideas will disappear from the scene as Trump's reign comes to an end. They have their own dynamics, but certainly the experiences of the last years, including those in the pandemics, do help to wear off their bright and attractiveness. Neocameralism, what Mencius Moldbug and Nick Land with him ushered in as a model of post-democracy that relinquish important ingredients of the human security system, is one of these projects that is proving to be too grounded in the past to have any capacity to foretell anything bright beyond the democratic rusting institutions. It is little more than necropolitics - which is itself a current post-democratic alternative. Achile Mbembe finds necropolitics in the regimes were warlords take over the state-like institutions (or mimick them)  to rule on the grounds of local security having no troubles killing or letting die whoever is in their path. Neocameralism pos...