Skip to main content

Aharon Link on me (version ALPHA)


So Aharon writes about me... This is a first version of his abstract for the Performance Philosophy conference in Guilford, next April.

CROSS QUESTIONING UNKONWNS WITH KNOWING NOTS

In this paper, I will use the question of doing philosophy through
performative acts for investigating how, through crossing of seemingly
un-related elements, new entities of questioning and practices are
created.
Diogenes was a human that was metaphorically crossed species with canine
to become “Diogenes the Dog”. I will argue that such a crossing helped
delineate who he is and how the practice of his philosophy is done, and
that the way in which Diogenes did philosophy resembles contemporary
Performance Art.
Instead of being concerned with the performance of language, speech and
speaking, we have in Diogenes a performer of actions and activities. It is
plausible to imagine a performance artist living inside a bath, wanking in
parliament (though perhaps will be arrested), or plucking a chicken and
declaring it human. Indeed the choice of performative acts in themselves
is a constant crossing between that which is “Life” and that which is
“Performance”. That very crossing - life reflecting upon a performance
reflecting upon life etc - is what I think to be a constant energiser for
using performative elements in questioning what we know, don’t know and
have no idea about..

Dressed as a bride, the philosopher Hilan Bensusan used his crossdressing
practice to bring a murdered performer Pippa Bacca, back to life and roam
the streets of Istanbul. While a performative act, such as “Brides for
Peace”, which Bacca, performed with tragic outcomes was questioning the
lines and links between life and performance questioning what we imagine
possible - Hilan’s activity was was of a more philosophical nature,
questioning the knowledge we think we have.

Another Performance Art/Act link of Bensusan’s philosophical lexicon is
The interest in Heracletian frgments as an ongoing anarchological
performative practice. Like Beuys, Bensusan makes use of
archeological-like fragments to invent time. Acts of performative nature
are practiced to cross, at will, between invented and shared realities of
the past. Through fragments which invoke an injection of cross questions
about what might question about, what they know not, and would have liked
to know of the object/fragment.
This way, both Beuys & Bensusan use fragments to create effects of
possible information crossings that tease desire within audiences.

Like any cross, there is a point-time of contact/collision of two
different inquiry trajectories. That point-time, I will argue, helps to
light up the different trajectories. Whereas the philosophical
performative inquiry is focused on How of thinking is questioned, the
artistic sensitivity is of how the sensations of imagination are
questioned. Hence, in my view, we have different, yet constantly crossable
trajectories which feed one another.

Through the examination of Bensusan’s extensive work on cross dressing,
cross speaking, cross translation, and indeed cross speciasation - which
takes us back to the post human origins of cynicism and the unknowns such
practices question - I will illustrate how performative, embodiment acts
that do cross practices, both generate new possible lives/information and
simultaneously remain at the prison cells of their propagator’s minds.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Giving Birth

This is a month of giving birth: 1. On the first day of the month (my birthday) I sent out my book BUG (Being Up for Grabs) to publisher. A birth-giving moment. 2. On the forth, we started the Journal, called Journal of Questions. It is a Jabèsian and Jarryian endeavor that intends to reflect in many languages about the gaps between thought and translation. It will be available soon. 3. On the 10th, day before yesterday, offspring Devrim A. B. was born. Her name means revolution in Turkish and is a roughly common name. She's very attentive and concentrated - especially on her own fingers that she learned to molest in her youth during her womb months. She was gestated together with BUG. Hope the world enjoys.

My responses to (some) talks in the Book Symposium

Indexicalism is out: l https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-indexicalism.html   The book symposium took place two weeks ago with talks by Sofya Gevorkyan/Carlos Segovia, Paul Livingston, Gerson Brea, Steven Shaviro, Chris RayAlexander, Janina Moninska, Germán Prosperi, Gabriela Lafetá, Andrea Vidal, Elzahrã Osman, Graham Harman, Charles Johns, Jon Cogburn, Otavio Maciel, Aha Else, JP Caron, Michel Weber and John Bova. My very preliminary response to some of their talks about the book follows. (Texts will appear in a special issue of Cosmos & History soon). RESPONSES : ON SAYING PARADOXICAL THINGS Hilan Bensusan First of all, I want to thank everyone for their contributions. You all created a network of discussions that made the book worth publishing. Thanks. Response to Shaviro: To engage in a general account of how things are is to risk paradox. Totality, with its different figures including the impersonal one that enables a symmetrical view from nowhere

Hunky, Gunky and Junky - all Funky Metaphysics

Been reading Bohn's recent papers on the possibility of junky worlds (and therefore of hunky worlds as hunky worlds are those that are gunky and junky - quite funky, as I said in the other post). He cites Whitehead (process philosophy tends to go hunky) but also Leibniz in his company - he wouldn't take up gunk as he believed in monads but would accept junky worlds (where everything that exists is a part of something). Bohn quotes Leibniz in On Nature Itself «For, although there are atoms of substance, namely monads, which lack parts, there are no atoms of bulk, that is, atoms of the least possible extension, nor are there any ultimate elements, since a continuum cannot be composed out of points. In just the same way, there is nothing greatest in bulk nor infinite in extension, even if there is always something bigger than anything else, though there is a being greatest in the intensity of its perfection, that is, a being infinite in power.» And New Essays: ... for there is ne